beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.04.28 2019가단6116

손해배상(기)

Text

1. As to the Defendants’ joint payment of KRW 30,000,100 to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B and Defendant E, respectively, on April 12, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants recruited the Plaintiff with G and H, etc. to obtain money by gambling by inducing the Plaintiff through gambling and gambling, and then soliciting the Plaintiff to obtain money. The Defendants solicited the Plaintiff as if they were aware of a large number of Bakahohohohohohoho Lakes, which would necessarily be able to do so, and induce the Plaintiff as if they were able to do so. At a certain level, H would like to manipulate the order in advance according to the number of the cards in accordance with the number of the cards, so long as 10 lines of the cards which H would be 10 lines of the cards (so called “Om card” or “Th card”) and the cards would be 10 lines of the cards (so-called “so-called “the cards”), so that the Plaintiff would be able to obtain money from the Plaintiff 200 to the Plaintiff, regardless of the order of discharge of the cards (so-called “the cards”), and then, Defendant 1 and Defendant 2, etc. would be able to receive money from the Plaintiff 200 to the Plaintiff in advance.

B. In the above criminal facts, Defendant B was sentenced to a stay of prosecution on the grounds that Defendant C and Defendant D were sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the period of eight months of imprisonment, one year of a suspended sentence of two years for each one year for Defendant C and Defendant D; Defendant E was convicted of a suspended sentence of three years for one year and six months for a suspended sentence of three years for imprisonment; Defendant F was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for fraud, and Defendant F was not guilty of fraud.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 to 8, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants, along with G and H, commit fraud against the Plaintiff.