except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who is married with C on August 1, 2002.

1. On September 16, 2012, Defendant A and the Defendant met with the upper Defendant B on the following occasions: (a) around September 16, 2012: (b) around 7:00, Daejeon Dmomotoel 706; and (c) one-time sexual intercourse with the

2. Defendant B was aware that he was a spouse of the Defendant A at the time, time, and at a place as referred to in paragraph (1), and had sexual intercourse with A once as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective statements in the first trial records;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for appraisal;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da14488