A. In fact-misunderstanding and legal principles, although the defendant misunderstanding the victim F and G's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of assault against the victim F and injury to the victim G is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and legal principles.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court duly admitted and examined the evidence as to the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and investigated: (a) the Defendant himself was the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her, and the victims also her her her her her her her her her her her her

(2) On April 8, 2014, 201, the date of the assault, the victim G’s cell phone photographic material, it is confirmed that the victim himself/herself was stored in a hole of her tumm on April 8, 2014, and (3) otherwise, that the victim G’s hole was caused by self-harm or other external causes.

In light of the fact that there is no special circumstance to see, it is difficult to find out.