beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.09.05 2018가단118411

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,034,289 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from July 30, 2017 to September 5, 2019 and the following day.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff is a person working as the head of Ban at the apartment cleaning service company in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the Defendant is a person working as the head of Ban at the same company. 2) On July 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:50 on July 30, 2017, the Defendant asked the Plaintiff at the waiting room for the above apartment cleaning service company as to whether the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the Plaintiff’s dismissal; (b) on the other hand, the Defendant was injured by assaulting the Plaintiff, i.e., at the time of the Plaintiff’s mucking of the Plaintiff’s both parts of hand, and breaking the Plaintiff’s both parts of hand, thereby causing injury, such as damage to

(hereinafter referred to as “instant injury”). The images of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 9, and 12 through 15, without any dispute over the ground for recognition

B. Since the Defendant committed a tort by assaulting and injuring the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages incurred therefrom.

2. In addition to the matters stated below the scope of liability for damages, it shall be as listed in the Schedule for Calculation of Damage, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The current value calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the method of simple interest deduction at the rate of 5/12 per month.

It is rejected that the parties' arguments have not been separately explained.

1) Property damage 1) The Plaintiff’s lost income (written evidence No. 8, 495,84) of the Plaintiff’s day care (written evidence No. 8, the result of the physical examination of the head of Seoul University Hospital) and the content of the evaluation (1) gender: (3) the age of 56 years when the Plaintiff was injured: 56 years: (5) the income of 56 years: (56 years of age: 4) the average daily wage (5 years of age: 65 years of age as stated in the report on the fact-finding of the construction income; 4) the Plaintiff’s day care expenses (written evidence No. 8; 495,844, the result of the physical examination of the above case); and (4) the content of the evaluation (1) gender: