2. In full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances leading up to crimes, and means and methods of sentencing, such as the victim who was denied by the Defendant, and the victim did not want punishment by mutual consent with the divorced victim, but the lower court appears to have determined punishment by fully taking this into account, and the Defendant’s nature of the crime is not less than eight times by using excessive materials, which are dangerous in the course of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s previous convictions due to violence, etc. are not less than eight times, and the Defendant’s previous convictions due to violence, etc. are subject to punishment, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable, since it is too unreasonable to the extent that the lower court’s punishment should be reversed.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.