If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is in charge of the head of the main office of the C Section 2, and the victim D (V, 61) is a person who operates the above restaurant.

At around 06:30 on March 23, 2019, the Defendant stated that “The fact in the hall of the above restaurant is not between E and E, a person in charge of the parking of the above restaurant, but between E and E, a person in charge of the parking of the restaurant,” and that “F, a staff member of the above restaurant drinking the coffee, refers to the difference between the President Park Park," and that “A, an employee of the above restaurant working at the kitchen of the above restaurant, who is a staff member of the above restaurant, around September 5, 2019, is the C president and Park Park Park, and the two people are inappropriate.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each statute on witness F, G, and D’s respective statutory statements;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;