위조사문서행사등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Forgery of private documents;
A. On March 15, 2012, the Defendant, without authority, stated “E”, “E”, “F”, “Seoul Mapo-gu 1 floor in the customer registry column,” and “E” in the customer address column in the communication company’s mobile phone confirmation number column for the purpose of exercising the right at the C office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On March 15, 2012, the Defendant stated “E” in the communication company’s mobile phone number confirmation column as “E”, “F”, “Seoul Mapo-gu 1 floor,” and “E” in the applicant column.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone subscription in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, the consent form for personal information utilization, and the application form for program subscription to the Schlage/LTE par.
B. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant stated, without authority, “J”, “E”, “F”, “Y”, “L”, and “E” in the column for automatic transfer of fees in the customer address column of the communications company’s LGU mobile phone entry application number column to be exercised by the Defendant at the I office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H, and without authority, written “E” in the column for each applicant’s application form for personal information utilization consent, Scler/LTE package agreement, and written “E” in the column for each applicant’s application form.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone subscription in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, the consent form for personal information utilization, and the application form for program subscription to the Schlage/LTE par.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), delivered an application for admission to a forged mobile phone to an employee of the sales agency of mobile phone who is unaware of such circumstances as if the document was duly formed.
3. The Defendant, as seen above, applied for and received a mobile phone opening in the name of E.