except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 30, 2019, from around 01:30 to 02:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s “D” main points operated by the victim C in Seoul Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) expressed the victim’s “calculated.” The Defendant expressed the victim’s “inception.” with the victim’s request for calculating the drinking value, the Defendant took a bath to the victim’s “inception.” On the other hand, the Defendant expressed the victim’s bar business of the victim, such as acting as the victim’s hand, thereby interfering with the victim’s bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. C’s statement;

1. Interim statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (a police officer's DNA camp image analysis), four copies of a photograph by cutting out a DNA camping image, and a DNA camping image;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1) (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1