However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:50 on May 18, 2019, the Defendant changed alcohol from C3, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, had the C, the C, not the D, for the reason of the completion of the business. On the other hand, the victim E (55 years of age) who had the C, expressed the C, “h, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, would have the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the C, the C

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear calls from persons for reference);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, recognized his criminal act instead.

The defendant has no power to be punished heavier than a fine.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be comprehensively considered and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order.