However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:40 on December 28, 2014, the Defendant: (b) under the influence of alcohol from an elevator with B apartment 106, the elevator door of the victim C, which was removed from the elevator door several times; (c) destroyed the elevator so that the market price of the repair cost cannot be known; and (d) caused the elevator to function for about 35 minutes.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2014. 12. 29. 00:12경 제1항과 같이 엘리베이터 안에서 문을 손괴하고 소란을 피워 112에 신고되자 신고를 받고 출동한 동두천경찰서 D파출소 소속 경찰관인 순경 E에게 "문이 열리는데 왜 안열어주냐, 씨발놈들아", "도와주기는 니네가 뭘 도와주냐, 문이 열리는데 왜 안열어주냐, 개새끼들아"라고 욕설을 하며 손바닥으로 위 경찰관의 얼굴을 때렸으나 이를 경찰관이 제지하자 계속해서 발로 경찰관의 왼쪽다리 정강이를 1회 차고, 양손으로 경찰관의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 경찰복 상의 점퍼를 잡고 흔들어 계급장을 뜯는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 112 신고사건 처리에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. Each investigation report (the confirmation of CCTV inside the elevator, hearing reports on references C telephone statements, and video CDs);

1. Application of CCTV screen and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case by damaging another person's property and assaulting a police officer in the course of performing his duties to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties of the police officer: