Examining the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below was just in maintaining the court of first instance that sentenced the Defendant to the collection of KRW 262,362,386, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the violation of the Personal Information Protection Act is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant alleged that it was the ground for appeal or that it was not subject to an ex officio decision by the court below.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.