If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 28, 2007, the Defendant promoted a loan of KRW 2.3 billion in the course of real estate development business to the victim C and the victim C (the 6.5 years of age) at the Namnam Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 825-33 on June 28, 2007. On the other hand, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he would receive a loan of KRW 30 million and repaid KRW 12 million until July 15, 2007.

However, the defendant did not have any business performance, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not immediately receive the loan and did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of Do, i.e., the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit certificates;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;