2. Judgment to be rendered for the confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the defendant shall only submit a formal reply after being served with the duplicate of the complaint of this case, and did not appear on the date for pleading without submitting a specific reply, and therefore, it shall be deemed that the facts constituting the cause of the above claim have been led to confession under

3. Some dismissed parts of the Plaintiff asserted the damages for delay as stated in the purport of the claim in this case due to damages due to nonperformance and unjust enrichment, but the damages for delay and unjust enrichment claims due to nonperformance are all obligations for which the maturity date has not been fixed, and shall be liable for delay from the date following the date when the claim for performance was filed. Since there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff sought payment of each of the above amounts prior to the amendment of the lawsuit in this case (principal KRW 150,427,81, KRW 135,917,425) or the amendment of the purport of the claim, it is without merit.