When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 6, 2014, from around 19:30 to around 00:30 of the following day, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she was provided with alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, etc. in B located in the following day, but acquired economic benefits equivalent to that amount because the Defendant did not pay the price after being provided with alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, etc. from around 19:30 to around 00 of the following day.

2. On January 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) issued an order for alcohol at F amusement stations located in E in the following City: (b) on January 8, 2014, even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price; (c) however, he did not pay the price to the victim G, who is the owner of the business, with the price of alcohol and service charges; (d) he would have been able to pay the price of alcohol and service charges; and (e) Mariju (150,000 won); (e) Mariju (30,000 won); and (e) 150,000 won (1.70,000 won); and (e) did not pay the price of alcohol, alcohol, and service charges to the owner of the business, with the price of service charges of KRW 50,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H with respect to the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;