손해배상(자)
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, except for the case's paper Nos. 3, 16, and 4 as follows, and therefore, it is identical to the part concerning the reason of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary parts] (2) The defendant asserts that "(2) the deceased was "the negligence walking the road without a white stick or guide dog." However, considering the whole purport of the pleading as a whole in the statement No. 13, the deceased can be acknowledged as carrying a flat white can, and if the deceased was walking at the time of the accident, according to the report at the edge of the road, it is reasonable to view that the deceased was walking along the road with a white stick even at the time of the accident in this case, and therefore, the above argument is without merit."
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.