2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:30 on June 6, 2014, the Defendant discovered the victim E (the age of 23) who d'D in Pyeongtaek-si C', set up a sobrying soup, discovered the victim E (the age of 23), took out the victim by shouldering the victim into the victim's side, putting the Defendant's hand into the victim's inside the victim's name, cut off the course of the female, putting the Defendant's hand into the victim's seat, putting the victim's hand into the victim's seat, putting the victim's body back, leaving the victim's body back, leaving the victim's body back, putting the victim's hand into the victim's inside the victim's body, putting the victim's hand into the victim's body, putting the victim's hand into the victim's part, and committing an indecent act by force by force the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes to on-site map and investigation report (with respect to the details of cell phone calls and the content of Kakao Stockholm dialogue);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Where a conviction against the accused is finalized in regard to the facts constituting a sexual crime subject to the registration of personal information under Article 16(2) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency

When considering the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effect of a sexual crime subject to registration which may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victim, etc., the child or juvenile should be considered comprehensively.