However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On January 8, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million at the Suwon District Court on the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the summary order of KRW 5 million at the same court on November 7, 2012 by the same crime and issued a summary order of KRW 5 million at the same court on the same charge on five occasions.

On July 24, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle on July 24, 2015, driven B-car vehicles at approximately 1m in front of the cafeteria of the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gyeong-gu Gyeong-do, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.092%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. The user ledger of the measuring instruments for drinking;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the fact that the defendant is against his/her will and that he/she has no history of prison labor);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning orders to provide community service and attend lectures;