However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 28, 2016, around 9:50 on February 28, 2016, the Defendant made a decision to commit suicide on the idea that the police officers dispatched to the preceding day in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment 101 Dong 607 were insulting the Defendant.

In recognition of the fact that, when the defendant put a stop on his body and attached a fire to the suspension, the apartment that lives of the occupants who are living in the fluor of the defendant's clothes and the goods located in the apartment can be destroyed, the defendant suspended the body, but after being suspended, the defendant attached the clothes accumulated in front of the fluor of the non-fluor apartment, and moved the fluor to the front of the fluor, but the police officer, etc. waiting to be dispatched to the site led to a fluoring of the clothes attached to the fluor.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to fire a structure used as a residence by setting fire to and burns the structure used by people.

There was an attempted attempt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Investigation reports, investigation reports (related to 112 mobilization), investigation reports (related to fire extinguishment), investigation reports (related to attachment of site photographs), investigation reports (related to attachment of site photographs), and investigation reports (to listen to telephone in the situation at the time of fire officers and fire officers dispatched);

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 (unauthorized Crime) of the Criminal Act mitigated by law;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the defendant among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the aforementioned normal consideration);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for nine months to seven years; and

2. An attempted crime is not subject to the sentencing criteria; and

3. The crime of this case in which the sentence of sentence is determined is committed is on the part of the clothes accumulated in front of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor in front of the fluor of the defendant's body by attaching the fluor with a stop in his own apartment