However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the husband of the victim D (math, 37 years of age), and is the father of the victim E (math, 13 years of age).

At around 03:40 on May 7, 2016, the Defendant sought the victims of the F apartment 102 Dong 301, F apartment 102 to look at the Defendant’s her children, and her married, and sought from the victim E the word “her home home”, thereby gathering a food blade (the total length of 33 cm, the blade length of 20 cm) that is a dangerous object in the kitchen chilling at the same time, and threatened the victims, and then, the Defendant had a knife the knife D that was the victim D.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the victims;

1. Each photograph, and details of a report on 112-case;

1. A record of seizure and a list of seized blades are owned by the injured party, and they do not be confiscated;

Application of Statutes

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) that reflects the

1. It shall be decided as per the disposition for the reason above Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;