2. In full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions in the instant records and arguments, even though the Defendant was aware of the fact that he/she committed each of the instant crimes, and agreed with D, the Defendant was subject to suspended sentence several times due to the same type of crimes, and criminal records were committed again during the same repeated crime period, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed reasonable, and it is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is groundless

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.