However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was issued, at the Gwangju District Court, a summary order of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). < Amended by Act No. 1033, Jan. 29, 2010>

On July 12, 2020, at around 21:53, the Defendant driven a Maz car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.095% at a section of about 500 meters from the front of a cafeteria near the Gwangju Mine-gu B apartment to the front of the D in the same Gu C.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, and investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of electric records, etc.);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.