A. In other words, the court below concluded that the defendant deceivings the victim J by deceiving the victim himself/herself even though he/she did not know about the amount of his/her / her her walth and did not calculate the amount of the walth and did not know about the amount of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the

B. The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unlimited and unfair;

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, i.e.,: (a) S who went to the operation of the victim J as the defendant, as the defendant, stated in the investigative agency of this case that "I am to drink with the defendant on the day of this case, I am to drink with the defendant on the day of this case, and I am to this end, and the defendant confirmed that I am to do so." (b) The victim J also stated in the investigative agency of this case that "I am to go first, because I am to go first, I am to go first"; and (c) the victim J stated that "I am to the same drinking value as I am to pay a drinking value because I am to the one who led all the orders and takes the middle of this case," as alleged by the defendant, it is difficult to view that S did not have paid a drinking value as the defendant's statement, and that it could not be justified in the judgment of the court below as alleged in this part of the charges.

The above argument is without merit.

B. We examine the judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing, and the defendant confessions most of the crimes of this case.