2. There are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the judgment, and that the defendant commits the instant crime in an difficult environment.

However, the fact that the defendant was sentenced to punishment for the same crime, and again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, the defendant received, delivered and administered multiple phiphones, and the amount of phiphones handled by the defendant is considerable.

In full view of the aforementioned various circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive for committing the instant crime, frequency of the instant crime and the circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.