However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2016 Highest 1539"

1. On January 14, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C before a post office, stating that the victim C would lend KRW 5 million to the victim C and return it at any time if it is requested to return it at any time.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the injured party as gambling fund, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused damage to it, the defendant 5 million won around January 14, 2016, and the same year.

3. Around 18.10,000 won received a total of 5.5 million won.

2. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant against the victim D told the victim D that he/she would repay the victim D with his/her work by not later than the end of April 2016, at the F cafeteria located in Gyeonggi-gun E, and by the victim D’s payment of the two-month monthly wages.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the injured party as gambling fund, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim as above; (b) KRW 6 million around March 10, 2016; (c) KRW 600,000 around March 18, 201; and (d) KRW 300,000 around March 28, 201; and

4.2. A delivery of KRW 500,000,000,000,000, in total, was received every four times.

3. On March 29, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the victim G at the I stock farm located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, that “A punishment shall be death and a funeral work shall be held,” and the victim G borrowed KRW 5 million as money needs to be paid, and interest shall also be paid within two months.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the injured party as gambling fund, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.