beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고단2997

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 1, 1995, the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on April 22, 1995, which was a violation of vehicle operation restriction by the employee A of the defendant specified in the facts charged, lose its retroactive effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act