The punishment of the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s violation of the instant crime, the recognition by the investigative agency of the instant crime, the Defendant has been punished several times as punishment for the same crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime habitually over 45 times in total after having been sentenced to imprisonment for 10 months due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the enforcement of the sentence was completed on June 21, 2014, and the repeated crime was completed on 45 occasions, and the victim did not agree with or recover damage, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is not reasonable.