However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 27, 2019, from around 06:05 to 07:05 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) while smoking tobacco in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, who listens to the phrase “D” restaurant operated by the victim C; (b) sees the victim’s speech that he does not smoke indoor; (c) under the influence of alcohol, she takes a bath with the large sound called “nick and spact gushes”; and (d) she prevents customers entering the restaurant by exposing the disturbance, such as lying the disturbance, from entering the restaurant, and preventing them from entering the restaurant.

2. 모욕 및 공무집행방해 피고인은 2019. 4. 27. 07:00경 위와 같은 장소에서 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 의정부경찰서 E지구대 소속 사법경찰관인 피해자 F와 피해자 G이 신원확인을 위해 신분증 제시를 요구하자, C 등이 있는 자리에서 술에 취해 피해자들에게 “이런 개새끼 씹할놈들아! 경찰관 좆같은 새끼들아! 너네 유착이지!”라고 큰소리로 말하고, “야 이 씹할놈아, 내가 거지꼴을 만들어 줄게!!”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 위 지구대 소속 사법경찰관인 H의 팔을 1회 때리고, I의 멱살을 잡고 가슴을 미는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting victims, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the investigation and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of G and F to each complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The following circumstances are the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(i) of the Criminal Code, and others.