소유권이전등기
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed.
B. The plaintiff, the plaintiff.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case mentioned in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 9. 9. 11- 14. Na, which has been written after the completion, shall be as follows.
“B. As seen earlier, the aggregate amount of the property(A) which serves as the basis for calculating legal reserve of inheritance (A) is KRW 1,754,947,107 [i.e., the aggregate amount of KRW 771,936,50 in the value of real estate + KRW 983,010,60 in the aggregate amount of KRW 548,328,82 in cash donation to Defendant C (i.e., the aggregate amount of KRW 548,681,785 in the aggregate amount of KRW 5,00 in the amount of cash donation to Defendant C). Meanwhile, even if Defendant B had performed an agreement on the legal reserve of inheritance of KRW 691,610, nursing expenses, KRW 400,00 in medicine expenses, KRW 1,307,00 in the aggregate amount of KRW 107,00 in the family court’s duty to support funeral expenses or the extent of the amount of the contributory portion to be deducted from the family court’s duty to support.