If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, 50,000 won.

The Defendants were allowed to enter the said casino as a passage in the same Section and the entrance to the said casino was prohibited, and Defendant B knew of the Defendant A’s driver’s license, and the Defendant B conspiredd to enter the said casino and to enter the said casino in order to play the game first, and then Defendant A was willing to enter the said casino and play the game.

Defendant

On March 12, 2013, A borrowed a driver's license from C, an official document under the name of the Commissioner of the Seoul Local Police Agency, from March 13, 2013. On March 13, 2013, A transferred the above driver's license to Defendant B in front of the Hanwon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seoul. On March 13, 2013, Defendant B requested Defendant B to present an identification card at the identity search team at the entrance of the Gowon-do Casino casino and presented the above driver's license as if he was his identification witness.

As a result, Defendants conspired to use official document in a fraudulent manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles 230 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;