However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 22, 2007, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of two million won in the Gwangju District Court's net support for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on September 20, 2012, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of one million and five million won in the same court as the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On May 30, 2015, at around 03:20, the Defendant driven a B body-man car in the state of alcohol with approximately 2km alcohol concentration of about 0.106% from the front day of the Yancheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-do to the front day of the Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yadong

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a circumstantial statement, detailed statement, notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving, and the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: Probation, community service, and order to attend a course of education has four times a previous conviction unfavorable to the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and the fact that there is no disadvantage in the suspension of execution or higher than that, reflects a mistake in the favorable circumstances, and all the conditions of sentencing recorded in the records,