공사대금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff’s claim for the construction cost and the claim for return of unjust enrichment based on the contract were dismissed in its entirety. Since the Plaintiff voluntarily withdrawn the part of the claim for return of unjust enrichment in the trial, the subject of the judgment by this court is limited to the part of the claim for the construction cost based on
2. The reasons why the court is to use for this case are the same as those set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.
[The defendant is basically repeating the same argument in the first instance trial, and even if the defendant considers the arguments and the reasons why the part of the supplementation was partially supplemented in the trial, and examines the descriptions of Gap evidence of Nos. 6 through 9 (including the number, if any) newly submitted evidence in the trial, the first instance judgment is justifiable]
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.