건물철거 및 토지인도 등
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where a part of the judgment of the court of first instance is affixed or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. A part which is written or added by the court of first instance;
(a) The same year after purchasing a third face five lines;
7.14. It shall be done after delivery.
B. In light of the fact that the use of No. 5 No. 16 lines was made, the eavess and girls of buildings, constructed in traditional traditional Korean-style houses, and it is difficult to view the structure of the building of this case after large-scale repair works, and thus, it is difficult to determine that the eavess and girls were newly extended during large-scale repair works.
(c) cannot be deemed to have been affected by Chapter 5, Chapter 18.
Next, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the above recognition was extended at the time of large-scale repair works, on the roof of the instant building, solely on the ground that he used a wooden straw and a straw straw, or the outer wall was accumulated outside the outer wall, is difficult to readily conclude that the instant female part was extended at the time of large-scale repair works. Meanwhile, as to the Plaintiff’s assertion that the said female part was installed after 2001, each image of the evidence No. 15 through No. 17 is insufficient to recognize it).
No. 6, 11 lines and 18 lines 4) The defendant and the defendant cannot accept the above arguments. 4) The plaintiff and the plaintiff cannot accept the above arguments.
each part shall be written in each other.
(e)the following parts shall be added between pages 6, 18 and 19:
5) The Plaintiff, in light of the fact that the net B, at the time of large-scale repair of the building of this case, he accumulated the outer wall of the building of this case in line with the boundary of the land at the time, is clear that the deceased is confirmed through the accurate measurement, etc. of the boundary of the site of this case. Thus, the deceased in this case (A) and (b) thereafter.