However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From September 21, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Defendant, unlike the four game apparatuses and the contents of rating classification, installed two game apparatuses for the mester game operated by the Defendant in the former B, “C” which were not classified in the “C” operated by the Defendant in the former B.

Each of the above games is carried out in a way that the prescribed scores are obtained in the event that the forest and the pattern are arranged in the manner of a satisfy with a contingency by a flexible method, and the defendant exchanged the game scores obtained by them into 10,000 won per 50 points in the game to customers.

As a result, the defendant provided game products without being classified or different from the contents of the rating classification, and conducted a business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as well as engaging in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of seizure (afford submission), the results of appraisal, the reply (afford submission, and a type 1).

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (which provides game products with contents different from those of the game products rated), Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 (which provides game products not rated) of the Game Industry Promotion Act concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (which provides game products not rated for use), Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. (which conducts the exchange business of results acquired through the use of game products), Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc.;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is subject to suspended execution;