교통사고처리특례법위반
1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won;
2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person engaged in driving of a rocketing taxi vehicle, and the victim C is a person engaged in driving of a D gender vehicle.
On May 26, 2016, at around 03:00 on May 26, 2016, the Defendant driving the said vehicle, and driving the Domari intersection in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon at an insular speed along the one-lane between the three-lanes in the direction of mountain direction in the direction of mountain direction. The victim C driving the said vehicle and driving the said vehicle at an insular speed depending on the two-lanes between the two-lanes.
In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding in accordance with the traffic signal.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to perform the same duty of care to port from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driving direction, and neglected to perform the same duty of care to port, and received the front side of the driver’s seat of the Damp vehicle driven by the victim C who entered the intersection of yellow ray, in contravention of the signal, and continued to port to port by the shock, and received the front side part of the driver’s seat of the F SM3 vehicle driven by the victim E (the 32 years old) who driven in the signal atmosphere.
As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones, which requires three weeks’ medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and the Defendant and the victim C suffered the injury to the victim G (the age of 67) (the age of 67) who flocked in the flock vehicle due to such occupational negligence, including cage cage flocks, which requires approximately six weeks’ medical treatment; the victim E suffered the injury, such as clocks, tensions, tensions, etc. of clocks, which require approximately two weeks’ medical treatment; and the victim H who flocked in the M3 vehicle, suffered the injury, such as flocks, tensions, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;