특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is engaged in the duty of driving K5 taxis.
On April 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the said taxi while under the influence of alcohol of 0.115% during blood transfusion, and driven the said taxi at the 0.115%, and driven the said taxi at the direction of the air-breath of the two-lanes in front of the D office located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Ansan-si.
At the time, the Defendant was at the front of the driving direction of the Victim E(28) driving, FK7 passenger cars in the FK7 passenger cars in the light of the signal signal, and thus, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as taking a well-known situation of the said K7 vehicle, securing safety distance, and driving, etc.
Nevertheless, due to influence of drinking, the Defendant neglected to drive in a state where it is difficult to drive in a normal manner, such as a scam and scam, and the scam, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence. The part of the Defendant’s driver’s above 7th driver’s vehicle in the front part of the Defendant’s driving, and the part of the back part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle in the above 7th driver’s vehicle in the front part of the Defendant’s driving, and the victim’s vehicle moved to the above 7th vehicle on the road once again in order to handle the accident. After receiving the back part of the above 7th driver’s vehicle in front of the above cab, the Defendant left the left part without stopping and going to the left at the front part of the 7th driver’s driving vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the said K7 car so that repair costs equivalent to KRW 902,118,00, and does not take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party by immediately stopping it, and the victim G by negligence in the course of the above occupational negligence for about two weeks.