On December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Busan District Court on December 23, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence on October 22, 2016.

Criminal facts

On August 29, 2017, the Defendant appeared in Busan District Court No. 352, which was located in Busan District Court about August 15:30, 2017, as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. to the High Court No. 2391, which was located in Busan District Court No. 352, and became a witness after being notified of the right to refuse to testify.

On April 27, 2017, at around 18:30 on April 27, 2017, C injected part of 0.05g of oponon into F's arms from Ecomher 706 head office located in Busan, Busan, and injected the remainder to F's own arms. However, C was indicted for the fact that F was forced to administer opon, and C was trying to reduce sentence to be declared by asserting that opon was administered in accordance with the mutual agreement with F.

Accordingly, the defendant is present as a witness in the above court and takes an oath, and the defense counsel "At that time, the witness will be able to write to the telecom."

Maburine Maburine Maburine

It is essential to say that F and Defendant were f at home and that they were born to the Defendant’s vehicle.

It is essential that the witness testified in the newspaper "..." and then, the defense counsel "after that the witness was born to G located in the Eel area while driving the Defendant's vehicle."

In the examination of "..", the defendant testified as "..." and the counsel "at the time when the witness was driven by the defendant and F while driving the defendant at the time, the defendant forced him to go F;

Mestly, the situation was boomed.

“I have complied with the newspaper”.

Then, there was a need to give testimony that “A like the counsel is in the same situation, which seems to have been detained;

It seems that they would be able to communicate with each other.

“I have gone to go only” in the newspaper “.”

The public prosecutor’s “the witness” continues to be the defendant and F.