Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the accident occurred due to drinking driving, etc.

However, under the influence of alcohol level 0.142%, the Defendant was found to have been driven while under the influence of alcohol level 0.142% and was found to have caused danger due to drunk driving, and the revised Road Traffic Act, which greatly strengthened the statutory punishment by reflecting public opinion demanding strong punishment for drunk driving, and in the circumstances widely known in society through media reports, etc., the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, are considered to be unfair, considering the circumstances that the lower court, while selecting the Defendant as a fine, imposed a sentence by discretionary mitigation.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed, and it is decided as follows.

[Discied Judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and a summary of evidence is as stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for reversal of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the record shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors.