On November 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the C Company located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, B was aware of a person who frighting to frighting, and received a report of 112 from 112, and received a request for eviction from the slope E belonging to the D District Unit of the Seocheon-gu Police Station D District, Seocheon-gu, which called “I am, I am, I do not have to receive the frighting money,” and used the eththic slick, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation and prevention of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;