Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On June 26, 2016, from around 04:10 to about 04:50 minutes, the Defendant was able to avoid any disturbance, such as: (a) at the convenience store located in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City); (b) at the convenience store located in the front of 40 minutes, when the Defendant went to the above convenience store, the victim D, an employee, was snicking from the Defendant’s body and ventilating the Defendant, and (c) at the victim’s “hick.” The victim “hick,” “hick,” and “hick,” and the victim’s height was tight, sealed the body of the customers who were in the calculation stand, and snicked on the floor, and snicked on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store management by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. There is no record of criminal punishment except for the confession, reflectivity, and the 10-year period prior to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the order of provisional payment.