However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

[criminal power] On November 13, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on November 13, 2012; and on December 29, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

On September 12, 2016, the Defendant, as a person with two or more times of drinking driving skills, driven a B-coo motor vehicle with approximately KRW 500 meters of alcohol content 0.077% under the influence of alcohol content from the roads in front of a mutually influent restaurant located in Tae-dong, Tae-gu, Daegu to the roads in the same Dong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting criminal investigations;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the number and time of punishment for the same kind of crime; the numerical value of blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving under the same case; the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.