도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The crime committed on March 4, 2016;
A. Around 17:50 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant driven a Dap Motor Vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of at least 0.066% in a section of approximately four meters in front of the father-and-child VillageB in the Gandong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
B. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of BDap car, was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which was not covered by mandatory insurance. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle without being covered by mandatory insurance in front of the father's villageBdong, Dog-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
2. The crime committed on March 21, 2016;
A. On March 19:10, 2016, the Defendant driven a C rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.192% from the section of about 1km to the road front of the water department in front of the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun, from the road of the Pacific middle school to the road front of the water department in front of the water department in the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun of the Pacific-gun.
B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a rocketing car.
On March 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car from the later distance of the net high school located in 6-lane 2-h of the Pyeongtaek-gu, Seoul, Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongdong-do on March 21, 2016, driving the said car along the two-lanes of the two-lanes from the surface of the raw road to the ropoli road, and stopped in the signal line. As the Defendant stopped in the signal line above the crosswalk stop line, the Defendant got out of the crosswalk stop line to the extent of not exceeding the crosswalk stop line.
At that time, there was a victim's e-hup XD car in the front side of the Defendant's vehicle, so the person engaged in driving of the automobile has a duty of care to properly operate the e-mail and the steering gear and to proceed with it at a safe speed and in a safe manner.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.