However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00, at the front of Sinung City B, the victim C (the age of 52) was receiving water in the water tank with parking his own vehicle; and (b) when the victim C (the age of 52) went to get off the vehicle, the victim’s strings the string and pushed down the string of the string, and then the string of the 21-day treatment of the 21-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each police statement to C, D, and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A complaint;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV image investigation), and a criminal investigation report (CCTV video access report);

1. The result of the CCTV reproduction viewing (the defendant and his defense counsel alleged to the effect that he had no intention to injure the defendant, but the part and degree of the injury of this case, the circumstances leading to the injury, and the actions of the defendant at the time (the victim's breath and breath of his breath, and the breath of his breath in hand) were committed by the defendant.

There is a possibility that considerable damage would have occurred if a horse was not removed in the vicinity.

In light of the location of the Defendant’s body and the victim’s body, and the fact that the victim committed an act of deceiving the nose, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant at least had the intent to allow the victim to suffer an injury due to the Defendant’s act and to allow the victim to do so, and that there was an willful negligence in doing so).

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: