except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Diplomatic Association where Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 203, the Defendant: (b) did not have any relationship with the victim E with F of the D Superior Association; (c) although the victim E was not in a relationship with F of the F of the D D Disabled Association, the Defendant stated that “E was aware of the fact that E was the head of the association and the E was aware of it; and (d) on August 2012, 2012, the Defendant stated that “E and F was not carried with the said G employee I and H attached to the above G employee I and H at the front crosswalk of the Diplomatic Association; (d) a male is not forgotten with the first love; and (e) a female is not able to be forgotten if you walked with the F of E.

이외에도 피고인은 2012. 9. 경 위 사무실에서 위 H에게 “나 몰래 둘이서 만난다, 내 눈 속이려고 쇼하는 거다, 그렇게 만나는 걸 내가 몇 번 봤다” 말하였으며, 2012. 9. 경 위 사무실에서 위 I에게 “내가 출근을 조금만 늦게 하면 조합장이랑 E이 붙어 있다가 내가 들어가면 아닌 것처럼 한다, 나는 그런 촉이 너무 빠르다”, “조합장이 E 으로부터 결재판을 받을 때 손도 만지고 허벅지를 스윽 만지는 것을 내가 몇 번봤다”고 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I and H;

1. Statement of the police statement of E, I, and H;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (the result of hearing statements such as complainants);

1. Relevant Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, pointing out false facts in the sentencing reason, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim, which eventually caused the victim to be placed in a situation where he/she should resign from the workplace when he/she was on the victim, provided the cause of home inequality, and the defendant who did not receive a letter from the victim is liable for the crime.