B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around June 14, 2019: (a) around 23:14, the Defendant was under drinking alcohol with the victim A (20 years of age) on the street, and the Defendant was under drinking alcohol with the victim on the ground that the Defendant was calculated, and the Defendant heard from the victim the phrase “I h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

"2019 Highest 3171"

2. On August 14, 2019, the injured Defendant: (a) had a hearing of the victim’s words “I will know about there is a previous conviction or attempted murder,” and (b) had the victim’s face at least 20 times on the hand floor, with the victim’s f (the 21 year old age), and had the victim spawn at the front of the entrance of the E apartment at Bupyeongcheon-si, Macheon-si; and (c) had spawn with the victim’s f (the 21 year old).

Summary of Evidence (Defendant B) / [2019 Highest 2398]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;

1. A report on internal investigation (field conditions, statements of a suspect, statements of witnesses);

1. A damaged photographics and CCTV image CDs (2019 Highest 2398);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of DVD to the written diagnosis of injury, CCTV images of victims (Defendant B);

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act (Defendant B) is that the defendant received a number of juvenile protective orders for the same criminal conduct.