사기
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. Defendant A, the representative of the Integian Fisheries chain F, is a person who, as the representative of the Integian Fisheries Association, performed an apartment interior construction from May 201 to November 201 of the same year to the buyer of the apartment unit (1,188 units, hereinafter “instant apartment”).
Defendant
B is a person who receives 30% of the earnings from the instant apartment complex construction from A, and is a person who has performed duties such as business and customer management as a former official of F.
On May 30, 201, the Defendants: (a) purchased so-called “old house” within the apartment complex before the completion of the instant apartment complex, and (b) provided the list of buyers and their cell phone contact numbers with H and I to pay KRW 65 million in return; (c) hired counselors to provide them with a text message to the buyers, stating that they will have the construction cost borne by 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
In the meantime, on May 23, 2011, the Defendant entered into an oral construction contract with the victim and received KRW 17 million on May 24, 2011, under the condition that he/she uses the said apartment as a house around November 30, 201, which was used as a house around 300,000,000 for the construction cost, and KRW 3.4 million on May 24, 201, and KRW 1,7 million on July 6, 201, the sum of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 in the name of the victim as a down payment, and KRW 3.6 million on July 6, 2011, the sum of KRW 3,000,000,000,000,000 in the name of the Defendant agricultural bank.
However, the facts of Defendant A are worth KRW 20 million at the time.