If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who had worked as a company B, a corporation.

On August 29, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the above company office located in Asan-si C, stating that “A victim E who operates D will pay KRW 2 million with the contract deposit, if the office household is supplied, by September 30, 2011.”

However, in fact, there was no intention or ability to pay the office price properly because the interest on the loans of the above corporation B is not paid properly.

The Defendant, from the victim on September 2, 201, is equivalent to KRW 8.5 million, and the same month.

5. A household was supplied with a total of KRW 1,00,000,000 and KRW 10,770,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against the defendant (including the whole part);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on trading lists;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;