사기
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
"2017 High 1085, the Defendant, on March 19, 2015, wanted the victim C to purchase a 70d Kamera on the Internet's website 207 of Ulsan-gu building B on March 19, 2015.
“To report and contact the writing drawn up and sell 70d Kameras in writing.”
A false statement was made.
However, there was no intention or ability to sell 70 Kameras.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and allowing the victim to deposit KRW 150,000 from the victim to the Do Do Do Do Do nam to deposit KRW 1,50,000 in advance, and received KRW 150,000 from the said account on the same day.
The Defendant and E (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) of the 2017 High 1086 (Seoul High 1086) are as between the Defendant and E (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) known from the public announcement source of the Ulsan Nam-gu F and 21 (G) around February 2015.
Defendant
The purpose of this paper is to raise living expenses, etc. by deceiving many unspecified persons to acquire money through deception by selling things on the Internet.
Accordingly, on May 2, 2015, the Defendant, etc. posted a letter of “Sales of gallon No. 4 smartphones” at “I” telephones located in Nam-gu, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, by using smartphones on the Internet site. The Defendant, etc. posted it on “Sales of gallon No. 4 Smartphones” to the victim J who reported and contacted this, “on the first hand transfer of money.”
The phrase “States” made a false statement.
However, even if the defendant et al. receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.
Defendant
As such, by deceiving the victim as such, 380,000 won was remitted from the victim to the new bank account in the name of E, namely, from the victim.
In addition, the defendant et al.
7. By December 22, 200, a total of KRW 1,757,00 was remitted from 15 victims through the above method, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
[2017 High Court Decision 1085]
1. The defendant;