2. The lower court determined the sentence within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (six months) by taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, under the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s confession of the crime, and the fact that the Defendant has no criminal records of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor or more punishment, and the fact that the amount of defraudation is not substantial, and the damage has not been recovered, taking into account the fact that the damage has not been recovered.

In the trial, the above sentencing conditions have been changed.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and if the above sentencing conditions are considered, the court below's punishment is judged appropriate.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.