When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 22, 2014, around 00:52, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force for about 15 minutes, such as: (a) 00:52, at the entrance door of the Triang apartment apartment located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the victim C used the D business taxi operated by the victim C, and thereafter the taxi fee has been high; and (b) drankly, the victim took a bath to be “feat feat” to the victim; (c) dump fe at the bottom of the lower taxi; and (d) dump the fe at the front right

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to the defendant

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;