In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

1. Defendant B, as an employee of Company E (hereinafter “E”), was required by Company G (hereinafter “G”) to enter into a drug supply contract entered into between G and F pharmacy while managing the “F pharmacy” in which Party E invested, and Defendant B, at around March 19, 2010, had Defendant B, a workplace company, enter the name and resident registration number, etc. in the first joint and several surety column of the drug supply contract entered into between G and F pharmacy, without obtaining the consent of I, from the E office located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and had Defendant A, a workplace company, enter the personal information, such as I’s name and resident registration number, etc., in advance, affixed I’s seal on the name subsequent thereto.

As a result, Defendant B forged one copy of the supply contract of medicines in the name of joint and several sureties, a private document on rights and duties for the purpose of exercising the right, and at around that time, at the F Contracting State located in Seocho-gu Seoul, the Seocho-gu Seoul High Court delivered the forged drug supply contract to K, who is an employee in charge of G, who is aware of the forgery, as described above, as if it

2. Defendant A as a regular manager of Defendant A, who was requested by Defendant B to make an additional entry into the above drug supply contract through Defendant B, and on June 2010, Defendant A entered L's name and resident registration number and other personal information in the second joint and several surety column of the above drug supply contract without obtaining the consent of Defendant B at the above E office, and affixed L's seal imprint in advance and back to the name.

Accordingly, Defendant A forged one copy of the supply contract of medicines in the name of L, a joint and several surety, a private document on rights and duties for the purpose of exercising the right, and around June 10, 2010, Defendant A issued a forged medicine supply contract to the above K through Defendant B and exercised it as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police of K.W.